Browsing by Author "Berlin, Daniel"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Aktuella frågor i omvärlden. Februari 2016.
    (Göteborgs universitet, 2016-02) MacHale-Gunnarsson, Magnus; Berlin, Daniel; Analys & utvärdering, Göteborgs universitet
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Arbetsgivares efterfrågan på generalister. En studie av utbildningskrav i platsannonser
    (Göteborgs universitet, 2013-01) Berlin, Daniel; Göteborgs universitet, Gemensamma förvaltningen, Enheten för analys och utvärdering
    I denna rapport undersöks platsannonser med avseende på vilka krav som ställs när det gäller de arbetssökandes utbildningsinriktning. Studien genomförs på 212 annonser inom yrkeskategorin PR/reklam/marknadsföring i Sverige, Storbritannien, Danmark och Norge. Krav på utbildningsinriktning klassificeras som antingen ”specifik”, d.v.s. att annonsen anger vilken utbildningsbakgrund som förväntas, eller ”halvöppen” i meningen att arbetsgivaren kan tänka sig ett begränsat antal olika inriktningar, eller ”helöppen” i meningen att arbetsgivaren inte närmare specificerar vilken utbildningsinriktning den sökande ska ha. Resultaten visar att svenska arbetsgivare i högre grad än i synnerhet de brittiska ställer specifika krav på att de sökande ska ha en utbildningsbakgrund som ämnesmässigt ligger nära det aktuella yrkesområdet. De brittiska arbetsgivarna har en betydligt större andel helt öppna annonser än vad som förekommer i de nordiska länderna.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Navigating Towards Effective Fishery Management: Exploring the Impact of Imbalanced Burdens on Regime Legitimacy
    (2008-04) Berlin, Daniel; Möller, Ulrika; Jagers, Sverker C.; QoG Institute
    Despite two decades of the Common Fishery Policy (CFP), the fishery politics of the European Union (EU) is considered a failure when it comes to securing fish-stocks. This paper explores reasons to this state of affairs by analysing the views and opinions among those subjected to regulations, namely professional fishermen (in Sweden). Since the capacity of any natural management regime to protect the resources depends on appropriators’ compliance, the prospects of sustainable natural management depends on improved understanding of when and why appropriators consent, and ultimately comply, with a regulative policy. So, when do fishermen comply with a fishery management regime? Instrumental views give a straightforward explanation; when the risk of being caught is considered high (and the potential economic profit of rule-breaking is low). More normative views point at various “qualities of government” such as procedural fairness, distributive justice, trust and legitimacy, but is much less specified in terms of actual explanations to appropriators’ actions. This paper adds a piece to the compliance puzzle by, relying on the model presented by Levi(1997), exploring the importance of 1) imbalanced burdens and 2) trust in authorities. Results confirm the importance of trust in authorities but contradict the idea that experiences of imbalance in burdens have a negative effect on legitimacy. Strikingly enough, fishermen who believe that other governments take greater concern in their fishing-fleets than the Swedish government, value the principles of Swedish fishery politics more.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Navigating Towards Effective Fishery Management? Exploring the Dynamics of Compliance
    (2007-12) Berlin, Daniel; Jagers, Sverker C.; Möller, Ulrika; QoG Institute
    This paper deals with compliance in the European and Swedish fisheries management regimes. It takes on a theoretical exploration of the dynamics of institutional compliance, and extracts six hypotheses based on theoretical approaches focusing on the links between compliance and individual level trust, compliance and instituional trust, and compliance and norms. More specifically, the hypotheses suggest (1) that fishermen experiencing that governmental authorities perceive them as cheaters will be more prone to accept rule violations that others; (2) that the inclination of individual fishermen to accept regulations depend on their perceptions of the behaviour of other fishermen; (3) that fishermen feeling that they and their Swedish fellows are put under stricter regulations and supervision than fishermen in other countries are more tolerant against violations; (4) that those experiencing that fishermen’s knowledge is valued among other parties are more positive to the prevailing regulations than others; (5) that fishermen with experiences from stakeholder participation in the fisheries regime are more negative to rule violations; and (6) that there is a moral distinction implying that rule-violations are accepted as long as they are considered as an expression of need rather than greed. The empirical test of these hypotheses are beyond the scope of this paper. Having presented the six hypotheses, a descriptive section on European and Swedish fishery closes the paper.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Utvärdering av satsningen "Det globala universitetet"
    (Göteborgs universitet, 2013-10-21) MacHale-Gunnarsson, Magnus; Berlin, Daniel; Analys & utvärdering, Göteborgs universitet