Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Hedberg, Karin"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    DISAMBIGUATING SEMANTIC ROLES IN SWEDISH COMPOUNDS with Swedish FrameNet and SALDO
    (2016-10-17) Hedberg, Karin; Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori; Göteborg University/Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science
    The compounding of words in Swedish is productive, recursive, and frequent in both text and speech. Compounds can be ambiguous on many levels, and the processing of them involves segmentation, lemma disambiguation, word sense disambiguation, and semantic analysis. In this thesis, we focus on the latter. We concretise the semantic analysis as semantic role disambiguation, meaning the automatic analysis of the relationship between the two parts of a compound (prefix and suffix) given a set of semantic roles selected by the suffix. The system architecture revolves around lexical resources such as the Swedish FrameNet (SweFN) and SALDO. In two experimental rounds, we train on (1) chunked and semantic role-analysed sentences, and (2) compounds marked up using the frames and semantic roles of SweFN. For instance, laxröra ‘salmon casserole’ is analysed as Constituent_parts+LU (LU=lexical unit) in the Food frame. The training data of tagged sentences used in predicting compound semantic roles is deemed too sparse, and produces only a small improvement over a most-frequent-class baseline. In our final experiments, we use a narrowed down set of frames and compounds as both train and test data. We reach a best classification accuracy of 62% against a 33% baseline on 100 unseen compounds.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback