Browsing by Author "Johnsson, Emma"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    ATT HJÄLPA NÅGON HITTA RÄTT VERSION AV SIG SJÄLV - En kvalitativ studie om organisatoriska skillnader och likheter samt införande av Socialstyrelsens kunskapsstöd inom könsidentitetsenheter.
    (2016-01-13) Johnsson, Emma; Andersson, Elin; Göteborg University/Department of Social Work; Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för socialt arbete
    Syftet med uppsatsen var att jämföra de olika könsidentitetsutredningsenheterna i landet för att se på eventuella organisatoriska skillnader och/eller likheter dem emellan. Vi ville se på om dessa organisatoriska faktorer kunde påverka möjligheten till en likvärdig utredning för patienter med könsdysfori. Vidare ville vi se på om Socialstyrelsens kunskapsstöd hade implementerats och hur det i så fall kunde påverka till förändrings-/förbättringsområden inom de olika utredningsenheterna. En kvalitativ metod användes med telefonintervjuer, samt transkribering av dessa i sin helhet. Intervjuerna innefattade fem professionella som alla arbetade på olika utredningsenheter. Studiens teoretiska utgångspunkt var nyinstitutionellt perspektiv på organisationsteori, med fokus på människobehandlande organisationer och implementering. Genom analys framkom att det både finns organisatoriska skillnader och likheter mellan de olika utredningsenheterna som kan påverka möjligheten till en likvärdig utredning. Dock också att det inte alltid endast var skillnader som bidrog till en olikvärdig utredning, utan att alla delar behövde sättas i ett helhetsperspektiv. Dessutom att det hade skett förändringar i och med införandet av Socialstyrelsens kunskapsstöd, vilket kunde vara en bidragande faktor till en linjering av utredningsenheternas arbete och strävan mot en likvärdig utredning.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Human rights within the discussion of entrepreneurship: On a secondary level in the education system
    (2014-06-27) Johnsson, Emma; University of Gothenburg/School of Global Studies; Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för globala studier
    In Sweden in the year of 2011 a new curriculum was put in place on the secondary level. This curriculum contains the introduction of human rights and the demand that human rights shall be visible within all subjects on the secondary level. Based upon this the purpose of this thesis is to examine how human rights issues are interpreted by the teachers when teaching entrepreneurship, together with discussing possible reasons and outcomes for this interpretation. Some claim human rights to be about fairness and on the socio-political left wing of compassion and a fight against the powerful while entrepreneurship focuses on efficiency and the optimal use of resources and to be wealth- and job creation and belong to the right wing of a political spectrum. Despite these claimed differences there seems to be possibilities for cooperation between the two. By interviewing teachers, who teach on entrepreneurship on a secondary level, in the area of Gothenburg this thesis examines their interpretation of human rights within the discussion of entrepreneurship, what problems and possibilities they see when bringing these two concepts together and also what possible factors can have an impact on the way human rights and entrepreneurship are being interpreted and understood within secondary level schools. The material from these interviews together with other researcher’s opinion about the education system, curriculum and its content as well as Michael Foucault’s theory about relationships of power and the creation of truths have been analyzed in a discourse analysis. The findings from this thesis research is that the teachers interpretation of the two concepts is similar to the one often used in society and previously expressed here where human rights is about each individual persons right to freedom without denying anyone else’s rights. Entrepreneurship they express to be about bringing development forward, reaching goals as well as being a tool and an attitude in how to live life. Using the two together is put forward as a positive thing where human rights can humanize entrepreneurship and thus keep it from becoming something negative with a risk of exploiting. However, I find the teachers discussion to be about issues in far away countries and not something in direct contact with each individual. I also see a risk of some rights getting more attention than others due to the teachers’ knowledge and understanding about human rights being too narrow.