Browsing by Author "Taavila, Tuomas"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    IMPERIAL RHETORIC AND THE FINNISH OTHER IN RUSSIAN LITERATURE in selected works of Aleksandr Puškin and Fëdor Dostojevskij
    (2017-06-16) Taavila, Tuomas; University of Gothenburg/Department of Languages and Literatures; Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för språk och litteraturer
    Inspired by the ongoing debate on Russia’s imperial revival, this paper is set to explore earlier manifestations of Russian imperial rhetoric in Russian literature of the 1800s. The second aim of this study is to analyse the imperial rhetoric with reference to one of Russia’s neighbouring countries, Finland. In these regards, this essay assumes that the Finns and Finland played a role in Russian nation building of the 1800s and, further, that Russian literature mediated this process. The questions asked are: How are the Finns depicted in Russian literature and what are the reosons behind it? As to the analytical considerations, this paper will primarily draw from conceptions uttered in studies of nationalism, colonial theory, and literature. In connection to Russian imperial rhetoric and the depiction of the Finns in Russian literature, the overarching practice of ‘othering’, i.e. the characterization of Finns as ‘Others’, is established. The theories and analytical devices form the base for the analysis of the material. The material of this study consists, firstly, of two poems by Russian national poet Aleksandr Puškin, Klevetnikam Rossij (To the Calumniators of Russia) and Mednyj vsadnik (The Bronze Horseman). Secondly, this study will draw from the fictional and non-fictional literary work of Fëdor Dostojevskij. The selection of Dostojevskijs’s writings will be limited to relevant thoughts expressed on the Russian nation and the depiction of Finns and Finland. The results of this study show that Puškin and Dostojevskij contributed to a ‘textual victory’ of the Russian colonizer over the colonized Finns. By applying possessing devices and devices of inferiorization the authors depicted the Finns as ‘Others’, against whom they defined the Russian imperial nation. Furthermore, it is essential to note that in colonizing the Finn, Puškin and Dostojevskij not only colonized an external other, but internal subjects of the Russian Empire as well. In this regard, the present paper can also be read as an addition to the study of Russian internal colonization.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    RUSSIA VERSUS “HITLER-GERMANY” AND “GAY-WEST”. Cultural History and Political Technology in Defence of a Besieged Fortress
    (2019-09-04) Taavila, Tuomas; University of Gothenburg/Department of Languages and Literatures; Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för språk och litteraturer
    Against the background of deteriorated relations between Russia and the West, this study conducts a Critical Discourse Analysis on the Russian nation-building project, facilitated by official rhetoric and state-controlled television. The essay starts with an examination of the cultural roots of a Russian ‘national idea’ and shows how these are present in today’s context. Further, it aims to determine characteristics of the inter-discourse communication between the elites and the majority. In an interdisciplinary approach, the study draws from literature on Russian cultural and political history, media and propaganda studies, and political science. The findings of the study demonstrate that the Russian national idea can be viewed to comprise of a horizontal and a vertical dichotomy, i.e. of Russia’s oftentimes-problematic relationship to its surroundings and a special bond between Russian rulers and the Russian population. Both dichotomies feature strongly in both official rhetoric and state-television. What regards specific characteristics of the inter-discourse communication, the findings point to a specific vanguard mentality of the elites, the prevalence of state-propaganda, and, lastly, a ‘typical Russian’ practice of shaping one’s worldview with reference to past events. In conclusion, Russia is imagined as a besieged fortress defending itself against, primarily, the Western Other.