Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Weitz, Nina"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Decentralization: An Antidote to Corruption in Water Services? A Comparative Study of the Enabling Environment for Corruption at Different Levels of Government
    (2012-02) Weitz, Nina; QoG Institute
    In the past two decades a common policy recommendation for improving water governance has been to shift the authority over water services to sub-national government departments. The advice to decentralize builds on principal-agent arguments and the assumption that decentralization increases citizens’ possibilities to monitor the responsible bureaucrats. However, previous research provides inconclusive results concerning the effect of decentralization on corruption levels. Moreover, how decentralization impacts the enabling environment for corruption has rarely been empirically assessed despite its importance for decisions concerning institutional reform. This paper is a first attempt to contribute to resolving the uncertainty on the link between decentralization and corruption in water services. The paper empirically tests the contradictive theoretical expectations that previous research present by quantitatively comparing the enabling environment for corruption between water utilities at national, state, municipal and village level. Using survey-data collected for this paper, ANOVA-analyses show that accountability is stronger in decentralized water utilities than centralized water utilities. The analysis also suggests, but results remain non-significant, that decentralized water utilities are less subject to monopolies, while they experience more discretion than centralized water utilities. Taking all three mechanisms into account, the paper concludes that decentralized water utilities provide a less corruption-favourable environment than centralized water utilities.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Does Being Successful Mean Performing Well? – A Minor Field Study evaluating the success of the Jordan River Basin Water Regime and assessing the need for including performance in analyses of international environmental regimes
    (2011-03-14) Weitz, Nina; Göteborgs universitet/Statsvetenskapliga institutionen; University of Gothenburg/Department of Political Science

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback