dc.contributor.author | Carlsson, Fredrik | |
dc.contributor.author | Daruvala, Dinky | |
dc.contributor.author | Jaldell, Henrik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-06-12T06:08:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-06-12T06:08:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-06-12T06:08:12Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/10296 | |
dc.description.abstract | We design a donations vs. own money choice experiment comparing three different
treatments. In two of the treatments the pay-offs are hypothetical. In the first of these, a short
cheap talk script was used, and subjects were required to state their own preferences in this
scenario. In the second, subjects were asked to state how they believed an average student
would respond to the choices. In the third treatment the pay-offs were real, allowing us to use
the results to compare the validity of the two hypothetical treatments. We find a strong
hypothetical bias in both hypothetical treatments where the marginal willingness to pay for
donations are higher when subjects state their own preferences but lower when subjects state
what they believe are other students preferences. The explanation is probably a self-image
effect in both cases. We find that it is mainly women who are prone to hypothetical bias in
this study. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 309 | en |
dc.subject | Stated preferences | en |
dc.subject | cheap talk | en |
dc.subject | hypothetical bias | en |
dc.subject | third person approach | en |
dc.subject | choice experiment | en |
dc.title | Do you do what you say or do you do what you say others do? | en |
dc.type | Text | en |
dc.type.svep | report | en |
dc.gup.origin | University of Gothenburg. School of Business, Economics and Law | en |
dc.gup.department | Department of Economics | en |