| dc.description.abstract | Background and Problem Discussion: Intangible assets are getting more and more
important to companies and their owners. The reason for this is that the economy has changed
from being industrial to knowledge-based. It is no longer the industrial value chain that
creates value, it is innovation and constantly seeking new ways of meeting market demands.
Companies can no longer differentiate themselves or create competitive advantages without
intangible assets. With increased importance of values in intangible assets, the need for
financial information about companies has changed. However, current accounting systems
have not been able to keep up with this development. Because of the uncertainty connected
with intangible assets, accounting cannot capture their increasingly important value.
Consequently, investors and other users of financial information are not provided with
sufficient information to make good decisions. This poses the question whether relevance has
been lost in accounting for intangible assets? Further, because of this possible lost of
relevance, perhaps alternative approaches on reporting of intangible assets are needed?
Purpose: The main purpose of this essay is to discuss whether relevance in accounting for
increasingly important intangible assets has been lost.
Method: To be able to discuss whether relevance in accounting for intangible assets has been
lost, we have laid a foundation consisting of existing regulations of accounting for intangible
assets, as well as literature and articles on the subject. Further, we have examined the
accounting for intangible assets in two Swedish groups, AstraZeneca and the Volvo Group, in
order to get a more practical view on the subject. The investigation of the two groups has been
made by contducting interviews and studying their financial reports.
Delimitations: The discussion of this essay will be delimited to the accounting for intangible
assets in big Swedish groups listed on the stock market. Consistently, the discussion will be
based on the accounting regulations for intangible assets applied in these groups, namely IAS
38 – Intangible assets and IFRS 3 – Business Combinations.
Results and Conclusions: The lack in current accounting systems lies in the fact that it
cannot capture all important intangible values. This results in traditional incomes statements
and balance sheets being misleading to investors and other users of financial information.
Further, because great values in intangible assets are kept hidden in today’s accounting,
investors are compelled to make difficult assessments about these values in order to make
their decisions. However, we do not find the solution in taking all intangible assets into the
balance sheet at any cost. The important qualities of today’s accounting, such as reliability,
cannot be jeopardized. Information about hidden intangible assets would therefore be better
provided through some kind of alternative reporting. However, this kind of reporting has its
errors in possibly being too subjective. | swe |
