dc.contributor.author | Boman, Anders | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-12-16T10:22:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-12-16T10:22:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-12-16T10:22:19Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/18892 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper uses a unique possibility to link unemployed individuals’ stated willingness to
move with administrative data, giving us the possibility to analyse the effects of mobility on
labour market outcome. Furthermore, we can do this not only for those who actually move,
but also for non-movers. I find that those who extend their search area in job search
geographically do have a higher probability of escaping unemployment. However, this
positive effect is not only present for jobs outside the local labour market, as would be
expected, but the greatest effect is found on the local labour market. This indicates positive
selection; i.e. it is not so much the increased geographic scope per se that increases the
likelihood of escaping unemployment, but mainly differences in unobservable characteristics
between those who choose to use a larger search area and those who do not. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 336 | en |
dc.subject | unemployment | en |
dc.subject | selection | en |
dc.subject | geographic mobility | en |
dc.subject | job search | en |
dc.subject | search scope | en |
dc.title | They seek it here, they seek it there, they seek it everywhere. But where is employment found? | en |
dc.type | Text | en |
dc.type.svep | report | en |