Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndrén, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-02T17:49:03Z
dc.date.available2009-02-02T17:49:03Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/19334
dc.description.abstractUsing a longitudinal data for about 1800 persons observed between 1986 and 1991, this study investigates the incentive effects on short-term sickness spells of two important regime changes in the social insurance system in Sweden implemented in 1987 and 1991. The results indicate that the rules influenced people’s decisions about when to report the beginning and ending of sickness spells. The 1991 reform, which reduced the replacement rate, had a stronger effect on reducing the duration of short-term absences than the 1987 reform, which restricted the payment of sickness cash benefit to only scheduled workdays.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francisen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000295287en
dc.subjectshort-term absenteeism due to sicknessen
dc.subjectsickness insuranceen
dc.subjectreformen
dc.subjectmultiple spellsen
dc.subjectunobserved heterogeneityen
dc.title'Never on a Sunday': Economic incentives and short-term sick leave in Swedenen
dc.type.sveparticle, peer reviewed scientificen
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawen
dc.gup.departmentDepartment of Economicsen
dc.citation.issn1466-4283en
dc.citation.epage338en
dc.citation.issue3en
dc.citation.jtitleApplied Economicsen
dc.citation.spage327en
dc.citation.volume37en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record