Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDulleck, Uwe
dc.contributor.authorKerschbamer, Rudolf
dc.contributor.authorSutter, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-02T15:16:20Z
dc.date.available2009-03-02T15:16:20Z
dc.date.issued2009-03-02T15:16:20Z
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/19527
dc.description.abstractCredence goods markets are characterized by asymmetric information between sellers and consumers that may give rise to inefficiencies, such as under- and overtreatment or market break-down. We study in a large experiment with 936 participants the determinants for efficiency in credence goods markets. While theory predicts that either liability or verifiability yields efficiency, we find that liability has a crucial, but verifiability only a minor effect. Allowing sellers to build up reputation has little influence, as predicted. Seller competition drives down prices and yields maximal trade, but does not lead to higher efficiency as long as liability is violated.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries348en
dc.subjectCredence goodsen
dc.subjectExperimenten
dc.subjectLiabilityen
dc.subjectVerifiabilityen
dc.subjectReputationen
dc.subjectCompetitionen
dc.titleThe Economics of Credence Goods: On the Role of Liability, Verifiability, Reputation and Competitionen
dc.typeTexten
dc.type.svepreporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record