dc.contributor.author | Dulleck, Uwe | |
dc.contributor.author | Kerschbamer, Rudolf | |
dc.contributor.author | Sutter, Matthias | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-03-02T15:16:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-03-02T15:16:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-03-02T15:16:20Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/19527 | |
dc.description.abstract | Credence goods markets are characterized by asymmetric information between sellers and
consumers that may give rise to inefficiencies, such as under- and overtreatment or market
break-down. We study in a large experiment with 936 participants the determinants for
efficiency in credence goods markets. While theory predicts that either liability or verifiability
yields efficiency, we find that liability has a crucial, but verifiability only a minor effect.
Allowing sellers to build up reputation has little influence, as predicted. Seller competition
drives down prices and yields maximal trade, but does not lead to higher efficiency as long as
liability is violated. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 348 | en |
dc.subject | Credence goods | en |
dc.subject | Experiment | en |
dc.subject | Liability | en |
dc.subject | Verifiability | en |
dc.subject | Reputation | en |
dc.subject | Competition | en |
dc.title | The Economics of Credence Goods: On the Role of Liability, Verifiability, Reputation and Competition | en |
dc.type | Text | en |
dc.type.svep | report | en |