dc.contributor.author | Carlsson, Fredrik | |
dc.contributor.author | He, Haoran | |
dc.contributor.author | Martinsson, Peter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-08-11T13:26:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-11T13:26:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-08-11T13:26:55Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/20794 | |
dc.description.abstract | A growing number of experimental studies focus on the differences between the lab and the
field. Important in this issue is the role of windfall money. By conducting a dictator game,
where the recipient is a charity organization, in exactly the same way in the laboratory and in
the field, we investigate the influence of windfall and earned endowment on behavior. We
find a strong effect on donation amounts of earned endowment in the lab and the field.
Subjects donate more if the endowment is a windfall gain. Thus, windfall money is important
not only in a lab environment. However, even for earned endowment, there is a significant
difference in behavior between the lab and the field. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 374 | en |
dc.subject | Charitable giving | en |
dc.subject | Dictator game | en |
dc.subject | Laboratory experiment | en |
dc.subject | Field experiment | en |
dc.subject | Windfall money | en |
dc.title | Easy come, easy go - The role of windfall money in lab and field experiments | en |
dc.type | Text | en |
dc.type.svep | report | en |