dc.contributor.author | Manescu, Cristiana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-01T06:53:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-01T06:53:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-09-01T06:53:01Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/20998 | |
dc.description.abstract | Using detailed data on seven environmental, social and governance (ESG) attributes for a long
panel of large publicly traded U.S. rms during July 1992-June 2008, this study nds that only
the community indicator has a positive impact on stock returns and furthermore this e ect is due
to mispricing. Additionally, we document a changing e ect of employee relations from positive
to negative between July 1992- June 2003 and July 2003- June 2008. The positive impact is
found to be due to mispricing, but for the negative impact there is some weak evidence that it
is compensation for low non-sustainability risk. A negative impact of human rights and product
safety indicators on stock returns in the more recent period has also been found to be due to
mispricing. The implications of this study are that certain ESG issues (employee relations in
particular) could be priced as risk factors as soon as there is higher information availability for
those ESG attributes. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 376 | en |
dc.subject | responsible investments | en |
dc.subject | market efficiency | en |
dc.subject | four factor model | en |
dc.subject | risk factor test | en |
dc.title | Stock returns in relation to environmental, social and governance performance: mispricing or compensation for risk? | en |
dc.type | Text | en |
dc.type.svep | report | en |