Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLöfgren, Åsa
dc.contributor.authorMartinsson, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHennlock, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorSterner, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-23T12:49:21Z
dc.date.available2009-10-23T12:49:21Z
dc.date.issued2009-10-23T12:49:21Z
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/21315
dc.description.abstractEarlier research has shown that using a default option has a decisive effect on individuals’ choices. In many cases, however, the low proportion of subjects who switch from the pre-set default option might partly explained by inexperience with the goods or services offered, and high transaction costs for switching. By conducting a natural field experiment when environmental economists registered on the web to a conference, the default option to offset CO2 emissions was randomly pre-set. Either the participants had to opt-in to offset, opt-out to offset or there was no default option, i.e. an active choice had to be made with no implicit “guidance” from the default. We used experienced subjects and had low transaction costs of switching. Our findings show that the default has no significant effect on the decision to offset.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries391en
dc.subjectCO2-offsettingen
dc.subjectDefault optionen
dc.subjectField experimenten
dc.subjectPublic goodsen
dc.titleDoes experience eliminate the effect of a default option? - A field experiment on CO2-offsetting for air transporten
dc.typeTexten
dc.type.svepreporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record