dc.contributor.author | Löfgren, Åsa | |
dc.contributor.author | Martinsson, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Hennlock, Magnus | |
dc.contributor.author | Sterner, Thomas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-23T12:49:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-23T12:49:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-10-23T12:49:21Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/21315 | |
dc.description.abstract | Earlier research has shown that using a default option has a decisive effect on individuals’ choices. In many cases, however, the low proportion of subjects who switch from the pre-set default option might partly explained by inexperience with the goods or services offered, and high transaction costs for switching. By conducting a natural field experiment when environmental economists registered on the web to a conference, the default option to offset CO2 emissions was randomly pre-set. Either the participants had to opt-in to offset, opt-out to offset or there was no default option, i.e. an active choice had to be made with no implicit “guidance” from the default. We used experienced subjects and had low transaction costs of switching. Our findings show that the default has no significant effect on the decision to offset. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 391 | en |
dc.subject | CO2-offsetting | en |
dc.subject | Default option | en |
dc.subject | Field experiment | en |
dc.subject | Public goods | en |
dc.title | Does experience eliminate the effect of a default option? - A field experiment on CO2-offsetting for air transport | en |
dc.type | Text | en |
dc.type.svep | report | en |