dc.contributor.author | Balafoutas, Loukas | |
dc.contributor.author | Sutter, Matthias | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-18T11:26:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-18T11:26:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-05-18T11:26:09Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22369 | |
dc.description.abstract | Recent research has shown that women shy away from competition more often than men. We
evaluate experimentally three alternative policy interventions to promote women in
competitions: Quotas, Preferential Treatment, and Repetition of the Competition unless a
critical number of female winners is reached. We find that Quotas and Preferential Treatment
encourage women to compete significantly more often than in a control treatment, while
efficiency in selecting the best candidates as winners is not worse. The level of cooperation in
a post-competition teamwork task is even higher with successful policy interventions. Hence,
policy measures promoting women can have a double dividend. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 450 | en |
dc.subject | Competition | en |
dc.subject | gender gap | en |
dc.subject | experiment | en |
dc.subject | affirmative action | en |
dc.subject | teamwork | en |
dc.subject | coordination | en |
dc.title | Gender, Competition and the Efficiency of Policy Intervention | en |
dc.type | Text | en |
dc.type.svep | report | en |