dc.contributor.author | Patel, Amrish | |
dc.contributor.author | Cartwright, Edward | |
dc.contributor.author | van Vugt, Mark | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-19T12:33:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-19T12:33:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-05-19T12:33:05Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22373 | |
dc.description.abstract | Individuals often have legitimate but publicly unobservable reasons
for not partaking in cooperative social endeavours. This means others
who lack legitimate reasons may then have the opportunity to behave
uncooperatively, i.e. free-ride, and be indistinguishable from those with
legitimate reasons. Free-riders have a degree of anonymity. In the context
of a public good game we consider the e¤ect of free-rider anonymity on
the ability of voluntary punishment to sustain cooperative social norms.
Despite only inducing a weak form of free-rider anonymity, punishment
falls and cannot sustain cooperation. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 451 | en |
dc.subject | Anonymity | en |
dc.subject | free-riding | en |
dc.subject | public goods experiment | en |
dc.subject | punishment | en |
dc.title | Punishment Cannot Sustain Cooperation in a Public Good Game with Free-Rider Anonymity | en |
dc.type | Text | en |
dc.type.svep | report | en |