dc.contributor.author | Eriksen, Roy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-02-09T12:37:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-02-09T12:37:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-12 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1502-7694 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/229 | |
dc.description.abstract | Roy Eriksen’s essay asks the question whether the notoriously unattributed The Taming of a Shrew might not in fact bear the trace of Marlowe’s hand. Recognising the tendency of critics to dismiss the play as a mere “bad quarto” of a lost play that Shakespeare drew on, Eriksen suggests that A Shrew may be Marlowe’s original work—a claim which the long-recognised presence of Marlovian allusions and Marlowe’s own propensity for self-quotation do not reject. | eng |
dc.format.extent | 313981 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | eng |
dc.publisher | Uni-pub, Norway (hard copy) | eng |
dc.subject | Roy Eriksen, Taming of a Shrew, Taming of the Shrew, Marlowe | eng |
dc.title | The Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship | eng |
dc.type | Article | eng |