Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Roy
dc.date.accessioned2006-02-09T12:37:47Z
dc.date.available2006-02-09T12:37:47Z
dc.date.issued2005-12
dc.identifier.issn1502-7694
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/229
dc.description.abstractRoy Eriksen’s essay asks the question whether the notoriously unattributed The Taming of a Shrew might not in fact bear the trace of Marlowe’s hand. Recognising the tendency of critics to dismiss the play as a mere “bad quarto” of a lost play that Shakespeare drew on, Eriksen suggests that A Shrew may be Marlowe’s original work—a claim which the long-recognised presence of Marlovian allusions and Marlowe’s own propensity for self-quotation do not reject.eng
dc.format.extent313981 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeneng
dc.publisherUni-pub, Norway (hard copy)eng
dc.subjectRoy Eriksen, Taming of a Shrew, Taming of the Shrew, Marloweeng
dc.titleThe Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorshipeng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record