Visa enkel post

dc.contributor.authorJohansson-Stenman, Olof
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-27T10:51:01Z
dc.date.available2010-08-27T10:51:01Z
dc.date.issued2010-08
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/23246
dc.description.abstractWelfare economics relies on consequentialism. Whether a public action is good or bad is then determined by the consequences for people, rather than for example by the extent to which it infringes on others’ rights. Yet, many philosophers have questioned this assumption. The present note presents new survey evidence where a representative sample in Sweden are asked about their ethical perceptions with respect to what matters intrinsically. Overall, people’s perceptions are largely consistent with consequentialism.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries467sv
dc.subjectethicssv
dc.subjectrightssv
dc.subjectconsequentialismsv
dc.subjectsocial cost-benefit analysissv
dc.titleAre Most People Consequentialists?sv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv


Filer under denna titel

Thumbnail

Dokumentet tillhör följande samling(ar)

Visa enkel post