dc.contributor.author | Johansson-Stenman, Olof | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-27T10:51:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-27T10:51:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-08 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/23246 | |
dc.description.abstract | Welfare economics relies on consequentialism. Whether a public action is good or
bad is then determined by the consequences for people, rather than for example by the extent
to which it infringes on others’ rights. Yet, many philosophers have questioned this
assumption. The present note presents new survey evidence where a representative sample in
Sweden are asked about their ethical perceptions with respect to what matters intrinsically.
Overall, people’s perceptions are largely consistent with consequentialism. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 467 | sv |
dc.subject | ethics | sv |
dc.subject | rights | sv |
dc.subject | consequentialism | sv |
dc.subject | social cost-benefit analysis | sv |
dc.title | Are Most People Consequentialists? | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.type.svep | report | sv |