Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolgersson, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLindström, Fredrik
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-10T11:33:09Z
dc.date.available2011-02-10T11:33:09Z
dc.date.issued2003-05-01
dc.identifier.issn0349-8034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/24412
dc.description.abstractThe properties of a forecast usually depend upon whether the forecast is conditioned on the final period observation or not. In the case of unconditioned forecasts it is well known that the point predictions are unbiased. If on the other hand the forecast is conditional, then the forecast may be biased. Existing analytical results in literature are insufficient for describing the properties of the conditioned forecast properly, particularly in multivariate models. This paper examines some finite sample properties of conditioned forecasts of the VAR(l) process by means of Monte Carlo experiments. We use a number of parameter settings for the V AR( 1) process to demonstrate that the forecast bias of the conditioned forecast may be considerable. Hence, unless the analyst has a clear idea of whether the conditioned or unconditioned forecast is relevant for the time series being analysed, statistical inferences may be seriously erratic.sv
dc.format.extent24sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.publisherUniversity of Gothenburgsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Reportsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2003:5sv
dc.subjectForecast biassv
dc.subjectconditioningsv
dc.subjectVAR(1) processsv
dc.subjectMonte Carlosv
dc.titleA comparison of conditioned versus unconditioned forecasts of the V AR(l) processsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record