Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEkman, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-18T15:06:00Z
dc.date.available2011-02-18T15:06:00Z
dc.date.issued1997-01-01
dc.identifier.issn0349-8034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/24562
dc.description.abstractIn many clinical experiments there is a conflict between ethical demands to provide the best possible medical care for the patients and the statisticians desire to obtain an efficient experiment. Play-the-winner allocations is a group of designs that, during the experiment, tends to place more patients on the treatment that seems to be better. Using a randomized play-the-winner allocation and making a suitable inference for the design, is a suggestion to perform a reasonable experiment for the above mentioned considerations. In this paper we will concentrate on sequential inference, for the case of simple hypotheses and for the case with simple hypotheses with a nuisance parameter. The response to treatment is assumed to be dichotomous. We proceed from Wald's sequential probability ratio test, SPRT, and Cox's maximum likelihood SPRT, for the two hypothesis cases above.sv
dc.format.extent55sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.publisherUniversity of Gothenburgsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Reportsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries1997:1sv
dc.titleSequential probability ratio tests when using randomized play-the-winner allocationsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.sveplicentiate thesissv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record