Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrisén, Marianne
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-22T14:11:20Z
dc.date.available2011-02-22T14:11:20Z
dc.date.issued1994-02-01
dc.identifier.issn0349-8034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/24608
dc.description.abstractDifferent criteria of optimality are discussed. The shortcomings of some earlier criteria of optimality are demonstrated by their implications. The correspondences between some criteria of optimality and some methods are examined. The situations under which some commonly used methods have a certain optimality are thus illuminated. Linear approximations of the LR (likelihood ratio) method, which satisfies several criteria of optimality, are presented. These linear approximations are used for comparisons with other linear methods, especially the EWMA (exponentially weighted moving average) method. These comparisons specify the situations for which the linear methods can be regarded as approximations of the LR method.sv
dc.format.extent30sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.publisherUniversity of Gothenburgsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Reportsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries1994:2sv
dc.subjectQuality controlsv
dc.subjectWarning systemsv
dc.subjectControl chartsv
dc.subjectUtilitysv
dc.subjectPerformancesv
dc.subjectEWMAsv
dc.subjectCUSUMsv
dc.subjectMoving averagesv
dc.titleCHARACTERIZATION OF METHODS FOR SURVEILLANCE BY OPTIMALITYsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record