Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, William
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-19T12:57:38Z
dc.date.available2011-08-19T12:57:38Z
dc.date.issued2011-08-19
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-628-8333-1
dc.identifier.issn1101-718X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/25651
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation Shalom Schwartz’ theory of the structure of basic human values is developed. A partially new structure is proposed consisting of pairs of contrastive values (Security – Courage, Manage by yourself – Get help, Adaptation – Own will, and Prioritize yourself – Prioritize others) and non-contrastive values (Happiness, Meaningfulness, Love, Enjoyment, Respect, Deeper understanding of the world, Achievement, and Health). It was hypothesized that the contrastive values form a circumplex structure and that the non-contrastive values are positioned in the middle of this structure. The circumplex structure can be understood in terms of four overlapping dimensions (Independence – Dependence, Person focus – Social focus, Self preservation – Self transcendence, and Comfort – Challenge Different kinds of value salience (Access, Importance, Positive – Negative evaluation, Ability, and Access) were used to measure the values. It was also assumed that high access to contrastive values leads to specific positive and negative emotions. The positive emotions are experienced as a result of increasing access to the values, and the negative emotions are experienced because the opposite values are losing access. In line with this assumption, it was hypothesized that less negative emotions would be experienced in relation to a given value if its opposite is less salient. Non-contrastive values were supposed to lead to more positive and less negative emotions than the contrastive values. Study I was a first attempt of constructing a structure of contrastive and non-contrastive values. Several deviations from a circumplex structure were found which indicated that the proposed value structure needed further revision. Study II tested the final value structure proposed in this thesis. In Experiment 1 the contrastive values formed a structure which was closer to a pure circumplex than has been found in comparable data testing Schwartz’ value structure. This was believed to result from the fact that the contrastive values have clearer opposites than the values in Schwartz’ value structure, and that the non-contrastive values are excluded. In Experiment 2 the non-contrastive values were with one exception positioned inside the circumplex. Study III confirmed that almost all contrastive values were related to specific positive and negative emotions. It was also shown that the salience of the opposites affected the negative emotions connected to the contrastive values, and that the non-contrastive values led to more positive and less negative emotions than the contrastive values. This thesis has presented and successfully tested a partially new structure for how human values can be categorized, how they are related to each other, and how they are related to emotions.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDoctoral Dissertationsv
dc.relation.haspartI. Montgomery, W. (2008). A re-conceptualization of value structure I (Göteborg Psychological Reports No. 37:5). Göteborg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, Department of Psychology.sv
dc.relation.haspartII. Montgomery, W., Montgomery, H., & Gärling, T. (2011). Purifying the quasi-circumplex structure of human values. Unpublished manuscript. University of Gothenburg, Department of Psychology.sv
dc.relation.haspartIII. Montgomery, W., Montgomery, H., & Gärling, T. (2011). Positive and negative emotions related to a circumplex value structure. Unpublished manuscript. University of Gothenburg, Department of Psychology.sv
dc.subjectvalue structuresv
dc.subjectemotionssv
dc.subjectcircumplex structuresv
dc.subjectmultivariate statistical methodssv
dc.titleHuman Value Structure and Emotionssv
dc.typeTexteng
dc.type.svepDoctoral thesiseng
dc.gup.mailwilliam.montgomery@psy.gu.sesv
dc.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophysv
dc.gup.originGöteborgs universitet. Samhällsvetenskapliga fakultetenswe
dc.gup.originUniversity of Gothenburg. Faculty of Social Scienceseng
dc.gup.departmentDepartment of Psychology ; Psykologiska institutionensv
dc.gup.defenceplaceFredagen den 9 september 2011, kl. 10.00, Sal F1, Psykologiska institutionen, Haraldsgatan 1sv
dc.gup.defencedate2011-09-09
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultetSF


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record