Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLantz, Björnswe
dc.date.accessioned2005-05-17swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T10:45:55Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T10:45:55Z
dc.date.issued2005swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-3704swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2606
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims at developing the theoretical understanding of revenue capping as a way of regulating monopolistic firms. It is shown that the fact that a standard monopolist regulated by a fixed revenue cap will raise its price above the unregulated monopoly level is robust to two-part pricing. It is also shown that when regulation of a two-part pricing monopolist is based on a hybrid revenue cap defined as a linear function of quantity, it is the slope of the cap that determines its incentives for efficiencient behaviour while the intercept of the cap only affects the profit level of the firm. This also holds if the cap is defined as a hybrid price-revenue cap. The general conclusion of this is that the slope of the hybrid cap needs to be steeper that the slope of the firm’s cost function in order to prevent the incentive to raise price above the unregulated monopoly level.swe
dc.format.extent14 pagesswe
dc.format.extent185564 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFE-reports, nr 408swe
dc.subjectMonopoly regulation; incentive regulation; revenue cap regulationswe
dc.titleTwo-part pricing under revenue cap regulationswe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Business Administrationeng
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid4201swe
dc.subject.svepBusiness studiesswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record