Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLantz, Björnswe
dc.date.accessioned2004-09-03swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T10:45:57Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T10:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2004swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2609
dc.description.abstractRevenue capping is a common way to regulate monopolistic utilities. A common suggestion when the revenue cap is cost based is that the regulator needs to determine the revenue cap so that both fixed and variable cost components as closely as possible match the true cost of the monopoly. In this report, however, it is shown that the variable cost component in the model needs to exceed the true variable cost in order to give incentives to efficiency improvement compared to the case of no regulation. It is also shown that the size of the fixed cost component only affects the amount of market power that the monopoly can excercise.swe
dc.format.extent23 pagesswe
dc.format.extent234905 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isosvswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFE-reports, nr 2004-404swe
dc.subjectMonopoly regulation; Price cap regulation; incentive regulationswe
dc.titleMonopolreglering med nätnyttomodellens princip – modellkalibrering och incitamentswe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Business Administrationeng
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid3852swe
dc.subject.svepBusiness studiesswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record