dc.contributor.author | Hansson, Henrik | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-12-14 | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-02-09T10:46:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-09T10:46:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | swe |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-3704 | swe |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/2622 | |
dc.description.abstract | Change and transfer of competence within an industrial company – complex
and interactive engineering.
This paper presents how transfer of knowledge and competence occurs in relation to a major
organizational change. The particular setting of predominantly engineers as organizational
players can be one explanation as to how structure sometimes is emphasized more than
content.
The theoretical issue in this paper is one of competence transfer and how competence is
communicated through the interaction of people. Collective competence is a term used to se
how this interaction creates organizational learning and development. The theoretical
foundation is primarily symbolic interaction; however the paper is more of a case study than a
theoretical argumentation.
One issue that is has been focused is the structure of meetings, and it is a concurrent issue on
the agenda. The reason for this is that the meeting structure in order to correspond with
hierarchical levels as well as the task and need for information has create a formal structure of
meetings to enable the concerned person to be able to attend the meetings needed. For a
person with high hierarchical status as well as one with many tasks there is a meeting to go to
every moment of the week.
The task of competence and knowledge transfer has been an issue that has not been discussed
in the sense one would think it has been. It has been in the background and the issues
discussed and focused on, mostly as unspoken but very dominant agenda are of a more
practical nature. The change has two major practical restrictions, group sizes should not
exceed 10 persons and the whole setting for the change had to be set before summer vacation
(in order to be able to move everybody’s office equipment etc). The official agenda, however,
is that the work should be subject to more commonality, the efficiency should be increased
and the balance between projects and line organization should be restored. | swe |
dc.format.extent | 31 pages | swe |
dc.format.extent | 356502 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | sv | swe |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | FE-reports, nr 2003-399 | swe |
dc.subject | Collective competence; learning; interaction; transfer of knowledge | swe |
dc.title | Förändring och överföring av kompetens inom ett industriföretag
– ett komplext interaktivt ingenjörsarbete | swe |
dc.type.svep | Report | swe |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Business Administration | eng |
dc.gup.origin | Göteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Law | swe |
dc.gup.epcid | 2846 | swe |
dc.subject.svep | Business studies | swe |