Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTsakas, Eliasswe
dc.contributor.authorAkay, Alpaslanswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-19swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:14:14Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:14:14Z
dc.date.issued2006swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2667
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect of the average individual in sample selection models, estimated by Heckman's two step procedure. We show that the bias that emerges as a consequence of interchanging them, could be very signifcant, even in the limit. We suggest a computationally cheap approximation method, which corrects the bias in a large extent. We illustrate the implications of our method with an empirical application of earnings assimilation and a small Monte Carlo simulation.swe
dc.format.extent16 pagesswe
dc.format.extent238888 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 239swe
dc.subjectHeckman's two step estimatorswe
dc.subjectaverage marginal effectswe
dc.subjectmarginal effect of the average individual; earnings assimilationswe
dc.titleSecond Order Approximation for the Average Marginal Effect of Heckman's Two Step Procedureswe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid5211swe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record