Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohansson-Stenman, Olofswe
dc.contributor.authorCarlsson, Fredrikswe
dc.contributor.authorAlpizar, Franciscoswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-06swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:14:20Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:14:20Z
dc.date.issued2001swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2676
dc.description.abstractWe find, using survey-experimental methods, that most individuals are concerned with both relative income and relative consumption of particular goods. The degree of concern varies in the expected direction depending on the properties of the good. However, contrary to what has been suggested in the previous literature, we find that relative consumption is also important for vacation and insurance, which are typically seen as non-positional goods. Further, absolute consumption is also found to be important for cars and housing, which are widely regarded as highly positional. Implications for Pareto-efficient taxation are illustrated using the results from the experiment.swe
dc.format.extent29 pagesswe
dc.format.extent651668 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 63swe
dc.subjectstatus; relative income; optimal taxes; experimentsswe
dc.titleHow Much Do We Care About Absolute Versus Relative Income and Consumption?swe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid1176swe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record