dc.contributor.author | Johansson-Stenman, Olof | swe |
dc.contributor.author | Carlsson, Fredrik | swe |
dc.contributor.author | Alpizar, Francisco | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-12-06 | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-02-09T11:14:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-09T11:14:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | swe |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | swe |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/2676 | |
dc.description.abstract | We find, using survey-experimental methods, that most individuals are concerned with
both relative income and relative consumption of particular goods. The degree of
concern varies in the expected direction depending on the properties of the good.
However, contrary to what has been suggested in the previous literature, we find that
relative consumption is also important for vacation and insurance, which are typically
seen as non-positional goods. Further, absolute consumption is also found to be
important for cars and housing, which are widely regarded as highly positional.
Implications for Pareto-efficient taxation are illustrated using the results from the
experiment. | swe |
dc.format.extent | 29 pages | swe |
dc.format.extent | 651668 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | swe |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics, nr 63 | swe |
dc.subject | status; relative income; optimal taxes; experiments | swe |
dc.title | How Much Do We Care About Absolute Versus Relative Income and Consumption? | swe |
dc.type.svep | Report | swe |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Economics | swe |
dc.gup.origin | Göteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Law | swe |
dc.gup.epcid | 1176 | swe |
dc.subject.svep | Economics | swe |