dc.contributor.author | Muller, Adrian | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-27 | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-02-09T11:14:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-09T11:14:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | swe |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | swe |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/2689 | |
dc.description | Revised June 2007 | |
dc.description.abstract | There is a danger that the CDM will fail to live up to its goals, namely reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced sustainable development.
Sustainability labeling is a promising strategy to hedge against such failures. Labels could also serve as a business risk-hedging tool. The existing labels for the CDM are not comprehensive enough, however. A two-tiered stakeholder participatory approach with national flexibility under an international umbrella could be a promising option. Due to the necessary bureaucracy this might not be
feasible. Labels in the spirit of the existing approaches – addressing only restricted
aspects of sustainability or not applicable to all sectors may be a second best option. Other instruments for the further regulation of the CDM, such as a profit tax, should therefore be discussed as well. | swe |
dc.format.extent | 16 pages | swe |
dc.format.extent | 140737 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | swe |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics, nr 228 | swe |
dc.subject | CDM; labels; sustainability indicators; risk; equity | swe |
dc.title | Risk Management in the Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) – The Potential of Sustainability Labels | swe |
dc.type.svep | Report | swe |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Economics | swe |
dc.gup.origin | Göteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Law | swe |
dc.gup.epcid | 5021 | swe |
dc.subject.svep | Economics | swe |