dc.contributor.author | Muller, Adrian | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-04 | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-02-09T11:14:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-09T11:14:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | swe |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | swe |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/2700 | |
dc.description | Version updated 2007-08-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | I show how the problems with zero and negative values in decomposition
can in principle be resolved by avoiding ill-defined mathematical
operations used to derive the decomposition formulae (division by zero and
taking logarithms of zero and negative values). Referring to integral approximation,
which is the basis of any decomposition analysis, I also discuss the
residual in decomposition and show that the presence of a non-zero residual
is natural and that requiring a zero residual as a strategy to identify optimal
decomposition methods is without basis. To nevertheless advise on optimal
decomposition methods, I suggest to investigate for which types of functions
different decomposition methods are exact or good approximations and how
they perform in simulations, where the exact integrals are known. Regarding
these criteria the LMDI seems to perform best. | swe |
dc.format.extent | 25 pages | swe |
dc.format.extent | 196 Kb | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | swe |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics, nr 215 | swe |
dc.subject | decomposition analysis; Divisia Index; logarithmic mean; energy consumption; emissions | swe |
dc.title | Putting decomposition of energy use and
pollution on a firm footing - clarifications on
the residual, zero and negative values and
strategies to assess the performance of
decomposition methods | swe |
dc.type.svep | Report | swe |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Economics | swe |
dc.gup.origin | Göteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Law | swe |
dc.gup.epcid | 4986 | swe |
dc.subject.svep | Economics | swe |