dc.contributor.author | Ambec, Stefan | |
dc.contributor.author | Coria, Jessica | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-09-27T14:16:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-09-27T14:16:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-09 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/27064 | |
dc.description | JEL classification: D62; Q50; Q53; Q58 | sv |
dc.description.abstract | We examine the choice of policy instrument price, quantity, or a mix of the two when two pollutants are regulated and firms’ abatement costs are private information. A key parameter that affects this choice is the technological externality between the abatement efforts involved, i.e., whether they are substitutes or complements. If they are complements, a mix policy instrument with a tax on one pollutant and a quota on the other is sometime preferable, even if the pollutants
are identical in terms of benefits and costs of abatement. Yet, if they are substitutes, the mix policy is dominated by taxes or quotas. | sv |
dc.format.extent | 30 | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 517 | sv |
dc.subject | pollution | sv |
dc.subject | environmental regulation | sv |
dc.subject | policy mixes | sv |
dc.subject | tax | sv |
dc.subject | emission standard | sv |
dc.subject | asymmetric information | sv |
dc.title | Prices vs Quantities with Multiple Pollutants | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.type.svep | report | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | Dept of Economics, University of Gothenburg | sv |