Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKairys, Jr., Joseph P.swe
dc.contributor.authorGraff, Richard A.swe
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-26swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:14:42Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:14:42Z
dc.date.issued2005swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2711
dc.description.abstractRisk matters when corporate debt has a positive probability of default. Lenders have traditionally used covenants to protect their property rights because the financing and operating decisions of firms can reduce the value of the firm’s outstanding debt. We examine the use of captive finance subsidiaries and special purposed entities (SPEs) to partition default risk within the firm. A more complex arrangement of property rights within the firm allows the parent firm to retain operating flexibility while offering lenders better protection. We conclude that capital structure is a relevant decision variable for corporate managers because firms are able to obtain leveraged finance at a lower cost when risk is partitioned using separate legal structures within the firm.swe
dc.format.extent44 pagesswe
dc.format.extent155233 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 183swe
dc.subjectcapital structure; captive finance companies; structured financeswe
dc.titleProperty Rights, Risk and Leverageswe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid4486swe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record