| dc.contributor.author | Johansson-Stenman, Olof | swe |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2006-05-12 | swe |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2007-02-09T11:14:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2007-02-09T11:14:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | swe |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | swe |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/2724 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper analyses normative implications of relaxing the conventional welfare economics assumptions anthropocentrism and welfarism, i.e. that only human well-being counts intrinsically, combined with various types of non-selfish individual preferences. Social decision rules are derived for the optimum provision of a public good (environmental quality). It is shown that in several cases analysed, the basic Samuelson rule still holds, in terms of aggregate marginal willingness to pay. | swe |
| dc.format.extent | 30 pages | swe |
| dc.format.extent | 160023 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en | swe |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics, nr 198 | swe |
| dc.subject | Altruism; welfarism; anthropocentrism; cost-benefit analysis;public good provision; social preferences; conditional cooperation | swe |
| dc.title | Costs Benefits Rules when Nature Counts | swe |
| dc.type.svep | Report | swe |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Economics | swe |
| dc.gup.origin | Göteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Law | swe |
| dc.gup.epcid | 4801 | swe |
| dc.subject.svep | Economics | swe |
