Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohannesson, Magnusswe
dc.contributor.authorMellström, Carlswe
dc.date.accessioned2005-10-06swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:15:03Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:15:03Z
dc.date.issued2005swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2741
dc.descriptionVersion updated 2008-02-08
dc.description.abstractIn his seminal 1970 book, The Gift Relationship, Richard Titmuss argued that monetary compensation for donating blood might crowd out the supply of blood donors. To test this claim we carry out a field experiment with three different treatments. In the first treatment subjects are given the opportunity to become blood donors without any compensation. In the second treatment subjects receive a payment of SEK 50 (≈ $7) for becoming blood donors, and in the third treatment subjects can choose between a SEK 50 payment and donating SEK 50 to charity. The results differ markedly between men and women. For men the supply of blood donors is not significantly different among the three experimental groups. For women there is a significant crowding out effect. The supply of blood donors decreases by almost half when a monetary payment is introduced. There is also a significant effect of allowing individuals to donate the payment to charity, and this effect fully counteracts the crowding out effect.swe
dc.format.extent35 pagesswe
dc.format.extent163513 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 180swe
dc.subjectCrowding out; monetary incentives; field experiments; altruismswe
dc.titleCrowding Out in Blood Donation: Was Titmuss Right?swe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid4448swe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record