Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndrén, Danielaswe
dc.date.accessioned2004-08-31swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:15:29Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:15:29Z
dc.date.issued2004swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2779
dc.description.abstractUsing a longitudinal data for about 1800 persons observed between 1986 and 1991, this study investigates the incentive effects on short-term sickness spells of two important regime changes in the social insurance system in Sweden implemented in 1987 and 1991. The results indicate that the rules influenced people’s decisions about when to report the beginning and ending of sickness spells. The 1991 reform, which reduced the replacement rate, had a stronger effect on reducing the duration of short-term absences than the 1987 reform, which restricted the payment of sickness cash benefit to only scheduled workdays.swe
dc.format.extent25 pagesswe
dc.format.extent322092 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 136swe
dc.subjectshort-term absenteeism due to sickness; sickness insurance; reformswe
dc.subjectmultiple spellsswe
dc.subjectunobserved heterogeneityswe
dc.title“Never on a Sunday”: Economic Incentives and Sick Leave in Swedenswe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid3831swe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record