Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKleist, David
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-03T12:36:09Z
dc.date.available2012-04-03T12:36:09Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-03
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-7678-816-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/28373
dc.description.abstractKleist, D. 2012. Methods for Elimination of Double Taxation under Double Tax Treaties – with Particular Reference to the Application of Double Tax Treaties in Sweden. Iustus Förlag AB. Uppsala 2012. 372 pp. ISBN 978-91-7678-816-5. The study deals with the methods for elimination of double taxation that are applied in double tax treaties. The first aim of the study is to systematise and analyse the methods for elimination of double taxation under double tax treaties in order to gain a better understanding of how they work. A number of issues relating to the application of these methods are analysed. Since double tax treaties are applied by tax authorities, courts, and taxpayers in a domestic law context, i.e. within the framework of the legal system of a particular state, the analysis focuses on the application in Sweden of the methods for elimination of double taxation under double tax treaties. The second aim of the study is to evaluate in a few selected situations the two main methods for elimination of double taxation recommended by the OECD, namely exemption with progression and ordinary credit, on the basis of whether tax neutrality is achieved. For the purpose of this study, tax neutrality is deemed to be achieved when the taxation of income relating to a cross border transaction corresponds to the tax that would have been levied in either the state of residence (i.e. capital export neutrality, “CEN”) or in the other contracting state (i.e. capital import neutrality, “CIN”), had the cross border element not been present. Furthermore, for the purpose of this study, tax neutrality is deemed to be achieved if the taxation of income relating to a cross border transaction is within the range set by CEN and CIN. The evaluation shows that ordinary credit stands a greater chance than exemption with progression of achieving an outcome which is consistent with the goal of tax neutrality in the situations selected for study.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.subjectdouble taxationsv
dc.subjectdouble tax treatysv
dc.subjectcapital export neutralitysv
dc.subjectCENsv
dc.subjectCINsv
dc.subjectcapital import neutralitysv
dc.subjectexemptionsv
dc.subjectexemption with progressionsv
dc.subjectmodified exemptionsv
dc.subjectlimitation of the tax ratesv
dc.subjectcreditsv
dc.subjectfull creditsv
dc.subjectordinary creditsv
dc.subjecttax sparing creditsv
dc.subjectforeign tax credit limitationsv
dc.subjectmaximum deductionsv
dc.subjectinterpretation of double tax treatiessv
dc.subjectmodel tax convention on income and on capitalsv
dc.subjectthe OECD Modelsv
dc.subjectthe Commentaries of the OECD Modelsv
dc.subjectsubject identitysv
dc.subjecttiming mismatchsv
dc.subjectattribution of incomesv
dc.subjectallocation of expensesv
dc.subjectRÅ 1996 ref. 84sv
dc.subjectRÅ 2008 ref. 24sv
dc.subjectRÅ 2010 ref. 112sv
dc.subjectdubbelbeskattningsv
dc.subjectdubbelbeskattningsavtalsv
dc.subjectskatteavtalsv
dc.subjectkapitalexportneutralitetsv
dc.subjectkapitalimportneutralitetsv
dc.subjectalternativ exemptsv
dc.subjectOECD:s modellavtalsv
dc.titleMethods for Elimination of Double Taxation under Double Tax Treaties – with Particular Reference to the Application of Double Tax Treaties in Swedensv
dc.typeText
dc.type.svepDoctoral thesiseng
dc.gup.maildavid.kleist@law.gu.sesv
dc.type.degreeDoctor of Lawssv
dc.gup.adminRegistreringen avser enbart spikbladet.sv
dc.gup.originGöteborgs universitet. Handelshögskolansv
dc.gup.departmentDepartment of Law ; Juridiska institutionensv
dc.gup.defenceplaceFredagen den 27 april 2012, kl. 10.15, SEB-salen, Handelshögskolan vid Göteborgs Universitet, Vasagatan 1sv
dc.gup.defencedate2012-04-27
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultetHHF


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record