Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartinsson, Peterswe
dc.contributor.authorCarlsson, Fredrikswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-01swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:16:14Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:16:14Z
dc.date.issued1999swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2846
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we test the validity of choice experiments with donations for environmental projects. In particular, we test whether or not willingness to pay for projects differs between a hypothetical and an actual choice experiment. Our results do not indicate that choice experiments suffer from overstatement in hypothetical willingness to pay; and this contrasts the results found in external tests of validity in Contingent Valuation. In addition, internal tests of validity indicate transitive and stable preferences in both experimentsswe
dc.format.extent19 pagesswe
dc.format.extent88153 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 1999:13swe
dc.subjectChoice experiments; External validity; Internal validity; Hypothetical and actual WTP; Public goodsswe
dc.titleDo Hypothetical and Actual Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments? - Application to the Valuation of the Environmentswe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid2342swe
dc.subject.svepBusiness and economicsswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record