Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohansson-Stenman, Olofswe
dc.contributor.authorDaruvala, Dinkyswe
dc.contributor.authorCarlsson, Fredrikswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-05swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:16:27Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:16:27Z
dc.date.issued2001swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2865
dc.description.abstractIndividuals' preferences for risk and inequality are measured through experimental choices between hypothetical societies and lotteries. The median relative risk aversion, which is often seen to reflect social inequality aversion, is between 2 and 3. We also estimate the individual inequality aversion, reflecting individuals' willingness to pay for living in a more equal society.Left-wing voters and women are both more risk- and inequality averse than others. The model allows for non-monotonic SWFs, implying that welfare may decrease with an individual's income at high income levels. This is illustrated in simulations based on the empirical results.swe
dc.format.extent29 pagesswe
dc.format.extent620893 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 43swe
dc.subjectInequality aversion; risk aversion; welfare theoryswe
dc.titleAre people inequality averse or just risk averse?swe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid2301swe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record