dc.contributor.author | Maican, Florin G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sweeney, R.J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-27T14:04:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-27T14:04:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-08 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/30147 | |
dc.description | JEL classification: C15; C22; C32; C33; E31; F31 | sv |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines power issues for the ADF and four break models (Perron 1989, Zivot
and Andrews 1992) when the DGP corresponds to one of the break models. Choosing to test an incorrect break model can but need not greatly reduce the probability of rejecting the null. Break points that are relatively early in the sample period have substantial effects of increasing power. For modest shifts in time trends, simply including a time trend without shift in the model preserves power, but not for large time-trend shifts. | sv |
dc.format.extent | 18 pages | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 536 | sv |
dc.subject | unit root | sv |
dc.subject | Monte Carlo | sv |
dc.subject | break models | sv |
dc.title | Costs of misspecification in break-model unit-root tests | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.type.svep | report | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | Dept of Economics | sv |