Visa enkel post

dc.contributor.authorMaican, Florin G.
dc.contributor.authorSweeney, R.J.
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-27T14:04:59Z
dc.date.available2012-08-27T14:04:59Z
dc.date.issued2012-08
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/30147
dc.descriptionJEL classification: C15; C22; C32; C33; E31; F31sv
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines power issues for the ADF and four break models (Perron 1989, Zivot and Andrews 1992) when the DGP corresponds to one of the break models. Choosing to test an incorrect break model can but need not greatly reduce the probability of rejecting the null. Break points that are relatively early in the sample period have substantial effects of increasing power. For modest shifts in time trends, simply including a time trend without shift in the model preserves power, but not for large time-trend shifts.sv
dc.format.extent18 pagessv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries536sv
dc.subjectunit rootsv
dc.subjectMonte Carlosv
dc.subjectbreak modelssv
dc.titleCosts of misspecification in break-model unit-root testssv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv
dc.contributor.organizationDept of Economicssv


Filer under denna titel

Thumbnail

Dokumentet tillhör följande samling(ar)

Visa enkel post