Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoria, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Henrik G.
dc.contributor.authorSterner, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-08T15:32:12Z
dc.date.available2012-11-08T15:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2012-10
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/31425
dc.descriptionJEL Codes: Q23, Q24, Q28, Q29.sv
dc.description.abstractMost research and funding in conservation has been oriented toward biodiversity per se. Until recently there has been little tangible effort in linking conservation to ecosystem service provision. Nevertheless, this trend seems to be changing due in part to the relative success of payment mechanisms that provide funding for the conservation of ecosystem services – defined as discrete and identifiable end-products. This paper describes the features of optimal policies to protect (i) biodiversity vs. (ii) ecosystem services and analyze to what extent the criteria in (i) and (ii) set against each other or create synergies. We also analyze how payments for ecosystem services affect the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services conservation.sv
dc.format.extent44 pagessv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries546sv
dc.subjectBiodiversity conservationsv
dc.subjectecosystem servicessv
dc.subjectsynergies and trade-offssv
dc.subjectenvironmental policiessv
dc.titleBiodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Services Provision: A Tale of Confused Objectives, Mulitple Market Failures and Policy Challengessv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record