dc.contributor.author | Alem, Yonas | |
dc.contributor.author | Broussard, Nzinga H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-02-28T10:57:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-02-28T10:57:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-02 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/32449 | |
dc.description | JEL Classification: O12; O33; Q12; Q16 | sv |
dc.description.abstract | We use panel data from rural Ethiopia to investigate if participation in a safety net program enhances fertilizer adoption. Using a difference-in-difference estimator and inverse propensity score weighting we find that participation in Ethiopia’s food-for-work program increased fertilizer adoption. Results also indicate that the likelihood of adopting and the intensity of fertilizer usage increased with livestock holdings for food-for-work-participant households providing some
evidence that the intervention helped asset-rich farm households more than asset-poor households. We find no significant effects of free distribution on fertilizer adoption or intensification. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that safety nets can be viewed as mechanisms that allow households to take on more risk to pursue higher profits. The paper highlights important policy implications related to the inter-related dynamics of safety nets and extension services that aim at promoting productivity enhancing modern agricultural technologies. | sv |
dc.format.extent | 23 pages | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 556 | sv |
dc.subject | safety net | sv |
dc.subject | fertilizer use | sv |
dc.subject | inverse propensity score weighting | sv |
dc.title | Do Safety Nets Promote Technology Adoption? Panel data evidence from rural Ethiopia | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.type.svep | report | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | Dept of Economics, University of Gothenburg | sv |