Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMyrseth, K.O.R.
dc.contributor.authorRiener, G.
dc.contributor.authorWollbrant, Conny
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-07T11:56:01Z
dc.date.available2013-06-07T11:56:01Z
dc.date.issued2013-05
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/32944
dc.descriptionJEL Classification: D01, D03, D64, D70sv
dc.description.abstractThe social dilemma may contain, within the individual, a self-control conflict between urges to act selfishly and better judgment to cooperate. Examining the argument from the perspective of temptation, we pair the public good game with treatments that vary the degree to which money is abstract (merely numbers on-screen) or tangible (tokens or cash). We also include psychometric measures of self-control and impulsivity. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find in the treatments that render money more tangible a stronger positive association between cooperation and self-control—and a stronger negative association between cooperation and impulsivity. Our results shed light on the conditions under which self-control matters for cooperation.sv
dc.format.extent37 pagessv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries567sv
dc.subjectself-controlsv
dc.subjectpro-social behaviorsv
dc.subjectpublic good experimentsv
dc.subjecttemptationsv
dc.titleTangible Temptation in the Social Dilemma: Cash, cooperation, and self-controlsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv
dc.contributor.organizationDept of Economics, University of Gothenburgsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record