dc.contributor.author | Lilliestam, Anna-Lena | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-15T08:21:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-15T08:21:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11-15 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-91-7346-769-8 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/34210 | |
dc.description.abstract | Historical reasoning is the organizing of information about the past in order
to describe, compare, and/or explain historical phenomena. In this study I
investigate the ability to reason historically in terms of agent and structure in
an educational context. What does it mean to reason historically in this
specific way? What does it take for students to develop this ability? Two main
materials are used: texts, where students reason historically in terms of agent
and structure, and lessons where the objective is to make it possible for the
students to develop this ability. I look for qualitative similarities and
differences in how the students reason, aiming at a pedagogically meaningful
categorization that allows critical aspects of the ability to be identified. The
analysis of the lessons deepens this understanding.
The difference between a temporal description of chains of events on one
hand, and reasoning about agents and structures on the other, is shown to be
crucial. The students must discern what reasoning in terms of agent and
structure is: a synchronous discussion of the relative importance of structural
factors and factors concerning agents in a historical situation. Students must
also discern that structures can be of different kinds, as can agents; that
relevant factors must be selected; that connections between the factors should
be made explicit; that these factors may be developed by further explanation,
by an assessment of their relative significance, by making comparisons, or by
making causal connections.
The results also indicate that the objects of learning tend to change when
enacted in the classroom: from the ability to reason historically towards the
historical content, and towards temporal accounts of chains of action. A
relationship is seen between the teaching in the different classes and how the
students reason. Counterfactual reasoning is found to be useful in making it
possible for the students to develop their understanding of structures, and as a
tool for formative assessment. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Gothenburg Studies in Educational studies | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 345 | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Centrum för utbildningsvetenskap och lärarforskning, CUL | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 29 | sv |
dc.subject | Teaching and learning in history | sv |
dc.subject | history didactics | sv |
dc.subject | Historical reasoning | sv |
dc.subject | Historical thinking | sv |
dc.subject | Variation theory | sv |
dc.subject | Agent and structure | sv |
dc.subject | Undervisning och lärande i historia | sv |
dc.subject | Historiedidaktik | sv |
dc.subject | Historiskt resonerande | sv |
dc.subject | Historiskt tänkande | sv |
dc.subject | Variationsteori | sv |
dc.subject | Aktör och struktur | sv |
dc.title | Aktör och struktur i historieundervisning. Om utveckling av elevers historiska resonerande | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.type.svep | Doctoral thesis | |
dc.gup.mail | anna-lena.lilliestam@ped.gu.se | sv |
dc.type.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | sv |
dc.gup.origin | Göteborgs universitet. Utbildningsvetenskapliga fakulteten | swe |
dc.gup.origin | University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Education | eng |
dc.gup.department | Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies ; Institutionen för didaktik och pedagogisk profession | sv |
dc.gup.defenceplace | Fredagen den 6 december 2013, kl 13.15. Sal BE 015, Pedagogens B-hus, Läroverksgatan 15, Göteborg | sv |
dc.gup.defencedate | 2013-12-06 | |
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultet | UF | |