Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlem, Yonas
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-10T11:03:38Z
dc.date.available2013-12-10T11:03:38Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/34642
dc.descriptionJEL Classification: O12, I30, I31sv
dc.description.abstractUnlike most studies of subjective well-being in developing countries, we use a fixed effects regression on three rounds of rich panel data to investigate the impact of relative standing on life satisfaction of respondents in urban Ethiopia. We find a consistently large negative impact of relative standing - both relative to others and to oneself over time - on subjective well-being. However, controlling for unobserved heterogeneity through a fixed effects model reduces the impact of the relative standing variables on subjective well-being by up to 24 percent and reduces the impact of economic status by about 40 percent. Our findings highlight the need to be cautious in interpreting parameter estimates from subjective well-being regressions based on cross-sectional data, as the impact of variables may not be disentangled from that of unobserved heterogeneity.sv
dc.format.extent20sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries579sv
dc.subjectLife Satisfactionsv
dc.subjectUrban Ethiopiasv
dc.subjectRelative Standingsv
dc.subjectFixed Effectssv
dc.titleRelative Standing and Life-Satisfaction: Does Unobserved Heterogeneity Matter?sv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv
dc.contributor.organizationDept of Economics, University of Gothenburgsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record