dc.contributor.author | Erling, Lars | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-21T12:45:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-21T12:45:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01-21 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/34865 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines the possibilities of interpreting the moral values and ethics presented in the current curriculums in a way that makes them inclusive and constructive. The study also reveals how the liberal democratic ideal, presented in the curriculums as a hyper-ideology, is not at all easy to define or live up to in the pluralistic school of today.
By close-reading and criticizing the curriculum for the Swedish senior high school (Gy11)
and by looking at it from two different points of views, as rules or norms and as a process, I
show how the curriculum can be interpreted as a basis or starting point for a communication
about values. I also discuss wether the aim of this communication should be consensus or an
ongoing process. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.subject | curriculum | sv |
dc.subject | values | sv |
dc.subject | process | sv |
dc.subject | consensus | sv |
dc.title | Ett ständigt pågående samtal – ett konstruktivt perspektiv på läroplanernas värdegrund | sv |
dc.title.alternative | An ongoing conversation – a constructive perspective on the values of the curriculums | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | HumanitiesTheology | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för litteratur, idéhistoria och religion | swe |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of Literature, History of Ideas, and Religion | eng |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |