Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFeld, Jan
dc.contributor.authorSalamanca, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorHamermesh, Daniel S.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-19T13:10:02Z
dc.date.available2014-05-19T13:10:02Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/35795
dc.descriptionJEL: J71, I24, B40sv
dc.description.abstractThe discrimination literature treats outcomes as relative. But does a differential arise because agents discriminate against others—exophobia—or because they favor their own kind—endophilia? Using a field experiment that assigned graders randomly to students' exams that did/ did not contain names, on average we find favoritism but no discrimination by nationality, and some evidence of favoritism for the opposite gender. We identify distributions of individuals' preferences for favoritism and discrimination. We show that a changing correlation between them generates perverse changes in market differentials and that their relative importance informs the choice of a base group in adjusting wage differentials.sv
dc.format.extent41sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries593sv
dc.subjectfavoritismsv
dc.subjectdiscriminationsv
dc.subjectfield experimentsv
dc.subjectwage differentialssv
dc.subjecteconomics of educationsv
dc.titleEndophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discriminationsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv
dc.contributor.organizationDept. of Economics, University of Gothenburgsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record