Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHauge, Karen Evelyn
dc.contributor.authorBrekke, Kejll Arne
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Lars-Olof
dc.contributor.authorJohansson-Stenman, Olof
dc.contributor.authorSvedsäter, Henrik
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-27T13:38:38Z
dc.date.available2014-06-27T13:38:38Z
dc.date.issued2014-06
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/36279
dc.descriptionJEL: C91, D64sv
dc.description.abstractIt has recently been argued that giving is spontaneous while greed is calculated (Rand et al. 2012). If greed is calculated we would expect that cognitive load, which is assumed to reduce the influence of cognitive processes, should affect greed. In this paper we study both charitable giving and the behavior of dictators under high and low cognitive load, to test if greed is affected by the load. In the dictator games we use both a give frame, where the dictators are given an amount that they may share with a partner, and a take frame, where dictators may take from an amount initially allocated to the partner. The results show consistently that the behavioral effect in terms of allocated money of the induced load is small if at all existent. At the same time, follow-up questions indicate that the subjects’ decisions are more driven by their feelings and less driven by their thoughts under cognitive load.sv
dc.format.extent32sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries600sv
dc.subjectcognitive loadsv
dc.subjectdictator gamessv
dc.subjectsocial preferencessv
dc.subjectpro-social behaviorsv
dc.subjectaltruismsv
dc.titleKeeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive loadsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv
dc.contributor.organizationDept. of Economics, University of Gothenburgsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record