Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGranhag, Fredrik
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-08T08:34:31Z
dc.date.available2014-10-08T08:34:31Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/37135
dc.description.abstractAims and objectives: The main purpose of this study is to map different perspectives on products, processes and the profession among analysts in an intelligence context. A further goal is to explore analyst perceptions of failures and obstacle in the way of making good intelligence analysis; and to compare the results with perspectives from policy makers and results from scholars among the field of Intelligence studies. Method and data: The study is based on semi-­‐structured interviews of intelligence analyst among an intelligence unit within Swedish Customs and is supplemented by a web-­‐survey. Results: The result points to a need for a definition of good intelligence which probably could help the promotion of quality management among the area of Intelligence Analysis. The use of verbal expressions of uncertainty can be a source for misunderstanding. By exploring analyst perspectives more of day-­‐to-­‐ day issues and problems can be addressed and also give nuance to research in Intelligence Analysis. The study advocates a transformation of the profession Intelligence Analyst, from tradecraft to be permeated by a scientific approach.sv
dc.language.isoswesv
dc.subjectIntelligence Analysissv
dc.subjectthe Conception and Confirmation Biassv
dc.subjectAnalysts Perspectivesv
dc.subjectProfessionalizationsv
dc.titlePerspektiv på underrättelseanalys -produkten, processen och professionensv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokSovialBehaviourLaw
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg / Department of Sociology and Work Scienceeng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet / Institutionen för sociologi och arbetsvetenskapswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record