dc.contributor.author | Granhag, Fredrik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-08T08:34:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-08T08:34:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-10-08 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/37135 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aims
and
objectives:
The
main
purpose
of
this
study
is
to
map
different
perspectives
on
products,
processes
and
the
profession
among
analysts
in
an
intelligence
context.
A
further
goal
is
to
explore
analyst
perceptions
of
failures
and
obstacle
in
the
way
of
making
good
intelligence
analysis;
and
to
compare
the
results
with
perspectives
from
policy
makers
and
results
from
scholars
among
the
field
of
Intelligence
studies.
Method
and
data:
The
study
is
based
on
semi-‐structured
interviews
of
intelligence
analyst
among
an
intelligence
unit
within
Swedish
Customs
and
is
supplemented
by
a
web-‐survey.
Results:
The
result
points
to
a
need
for
a
definition
of
good
intelligence
which
probably
could
help
the
promotion
of
quality
management
among
the
area
of
Intelligence
Analysis.
The
use
of
verbal
expressions
of
uncertainty
can
be
a
source
for
misunderstanding.
By
exploring
analyst
perspectives
more
of
day-‐to-‐
day
issues
and
problems
can
be
addressed
and
also
give
nuance
to
research
in
Intelligence
Analysis.
The
study
advocates
a
transformation
of
the
profession
Intelligence
Analyst,
from
tradecraft
to
be
permeated
by
a
scientific
approach. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.subject | Intelligence Analysis | sv |
dc.subject | the Conception and Confirmation Bias | sv |
dc.subject | Analysts Perspective | sv |
dc.subject | Professionalization | sv |
dc.title | Perspektiv på underrättelseanalys -produkten, processen och professionen | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SovialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg / Department of Sociology and Work Science | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet / Institutionen för sociologi och arbetsvetenskap | swe |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |