Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAula, Pekka
dc.contributor.authorSiira, Kalle
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-21T10:02:10Z
dc.date.available2014-11-21T10:02:10Z
dc.date.issued2010-06
dc.identifier.citationNordicom Review 31 (2010) 1, pp. 125-141sv
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-86523-05-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/37465
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present article is to examine the prevailing model of systematic organizational conflict management from an organizational communicative perspective and to suggest directions for improvement. Particularly the model of conflict management system (CMS) is examined at the macro-level from the novel theoretical perspective of social complexity augmented with an interpretive view of organizational communication. Specifically two models – the dual function of communication and the arena model – are utilized to illustrate weaknesses and points of development in traditional CMS thinking. CMS was found to represent a rather limited vision of contemporary conflict management. It is rooted in a mechanistic view of organizational communication, which, we assert, is problematic from the organizational conflict management perspective, both theoretically and practically. The differences between CMS and social complexity approaches are identified, and a fresh framework for strategic conflict management is introduced.sv
dc.format.extent18sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.publisherNordic Council of Ministers, Nordicomsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNordicom Reviewsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries1/2010sv
dc.subjectconflict managementsv
dc.subjectconflict management systemsv
dc.subjectsocial complexitysv
dc.subjectorgani - zational communicationsv
dc.titleOrganizational Communication and Conflict Management Systems A Social Complexity Approachsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.sveparticle, peer reviewed scientificsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record