Dead Ground Fallacies of Understanding Global Divides, Policy-Making and Communication
Abstract
This chapter addresses cultural production and global divides from a media geographer’s
point of view by introducing ‘dead ground’ as its central concept. This concept is borrowed from strategic thinking, originally a military term, and refers to ground that cannot be observed or experienced empirically – but (in this case) is often subjected to inference based on conventional thinking, ‘common knowledge’ based on experiences from other systems, or other epistemological environments that do not necessarily bear the required truth value. ‘Dead ground’ is explored as an ontological and epistemological concept, related to fallacies that are present in the globalisation discussion. It will particularly analyse three different fallacies: the single trajectory fallacy, the single rationality fallacy, and the single moral fallacy.
The chapter raises the question as to whether these fallacies have been inherent in Western media studies, and if they have, if they might have facilitated cognitive colonisation of the analysis of changing cultures.
Publisher
Nordic Council of Ministers, Nordicom
Citation
Nordicom Review 30 Jubilee Issue (2009) pp. 141-149
Collections
View/ Open
Date
2009-06Author
Salovaara-Moring, Inka
Editor
Carlsson, Ulla
Keywords
Dead ground
space
globalization
Eastern Europe
policymaking
Publication type
article, peer reviewed scientific
ISBN
978-91-86523-67-1
Series/Report no.
Nordicom Review
30 Jubilee Issue 2009
Language
eng